What if we trained our airline pilots like we train our teachers?

” If we trained airline pilots the way we train teachers, we’d give them a 2-year training program behind maybe a simulator, but most of it would be lecture. And then we would give them the hardest plane to fly! We wouldn’t give them an easy plane to fly, because the pilots with seniority get that plane. They would never get training again. Everything they would learn during their career, they would learn by happenstance. And if they can survive 30 years, then they can get the easy planes to fly. We don’t train doctors the way we train teachers, we don’t train lawyers the way we train teachers. We don’t train airline pilots this way. You would never think of [doing that]. We wouldn’t do this to any other profession, but somehow teaching is different.”

I love this analogy because it highlights how little we as a society value the profession of teaching. There is no other profession that expects its novices to be fully fledged the moment they receive a license or certificate. Anyone who has spent any time as a teacher can attest to the fact that the journey of a teacher is a lifelong journey, that requires ongoing development and improvement. However the fact that the profession isn’t widely seen as a “craft” means that when the challenge of reforming the education system enters the dialogue, the topic of teacher effectiveness becomes a debate about accountability and teacher merit. Perhaps, the solution involves taking a look at the profession of teaching and elevating it in importance and value to our society.

Two weeks ago, I spent some time with Linda Shore, the Director of the Teacher Institute at the Exploratorium in San Francisco, when she shared with me some of the history and impact of their approach to professional development for science teachers. It struck me how powerful this is in addressing this perception of the profession. Linda describes the program as a lifelong journey and explained that their program takes the approach of a Guild, much like the process used in medieval times, because they believe developing mastery as a teacher requires support from mentor teachers, the opportunity to develop new strategies, and a peer community to share ideas and best practices. Nowhere is this more critical than when instituting a change in pedagogy such as integrating STEM education.

“The way we look at teachers in the Teacher Institute is, it’s a Guild. Just like a Medieval Guild. Just like the old guilds of practice where you’d study to be a tailor or you’d study to be a goldsmith, and everybody knew it took a lifetime to become a master. Nobody expected you in your first 2 years to become Master Goldsmith. But for some reason, with education, you graduate from college and you’re supposed to be fully baked. Or perhaps we’ll give you a little induction, we’ll tweak you a little bit, and then congratulations you’re a fully fledged Master Teacher. That just happens, nowhere. But that’s how we train teachers [in this country]. At the Teacher Institute, we’ve always seen it as a lifelong journey that you never finish, you’re always aiming to get better. You spend the rest of your life, like a concert violinist improving your craft, getting better, talking to people who know better about something than you do, getting better, still. That is the idea that is infused in our whole program. When these beginning teachers start, we make it very clear, ‘Congratulations, you’re going to be here for life, because this is a guild. And the ‘cloth’ we’re dealing with is student centered learning.’ “

What a powerful idea! Just this morning, I spoke with Ms. Reo Pruiett from Educate Texas (formerly Texas High School Project) to discuss the success that Texas has seen with it’s statewide STEM education initiative. In 2007, the Texas Education Agency initiated the THSP to design and transform high schools around the state to have a STEM focus, using a blueprint that outlined 7 keys to school design. Ms. Pruiett shared with me some of the challenges leaders in their program have faced over its 5 year history. One of these challenges has been in getting buy-in to the change in pedagogy. She described the shift from traditional instruction, where the teacher was expected to be the’ expert’, to a project-based learning approach, where the teacher facilitated the learning, and put the responsibility for working hard on the student.

“We use project based learning to build connections because that’s what also mirrors what you have to do in the workforce, in industry, and in the real world. As we worked through developing project based learning for our teachers, it was a challenge in the beginning for teachers to give up the more traditional approach and to build out concepts where you blend the learning. Because we’ve been so test-driven, teachers think, “What if I teach like this and they don’t score high?”

This approach has proven itself in Texas where the T-STEM Academies are transforming schools from under-performing, with low graduation rates, to schools with high percentage of graduates who move on to 2- and 4-year colleges.

“That’s been a challenge that we’ve been overcoming. Because now kids are making the connections and because we’re making real world connections, they are better problem solvers. And it really does not cause you to lose ground. They’re still going to do well on your state test. Just because you teach the goals and objectives in a different way, doesn’t mean learning hasn’t occurred. In fact, the learning is much better, because the kids will remember how to do this at a greater rate”

Si much of the work in education reform focuses the importance of improving teacher effectiveness, but we must not only improve effectiveness, we need to INSPIRE change and transformation. As Albert Einstein once said, “We can’t solve problems with the same thinking that caused the problem!” In order to see the scope of transformation necessary in our education system, we must first begin to look at the Teaching Profession as one that is critical to the health and success of our Nation. Just as we encourage our most capable students to aspire to be doctors, lawyers, and business and community leaders, we must encourage our best students to enter the profession of teaching! It is that important! Let’s do the work…

This entry was published on May 2, 2012 at 11:16 pm. It’s filed under Leadership, Project Based Learning, Science Education, STEM Education and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post.

5 thoughts on “What if we trained our airline pilots like we train our teachers?

  1. Thank you for these excellent thoughts. I think training teachers as we do any other developmental profession, such as one in the arts, is an excellent way to go. The idea that one graduates, gets a license (even if provisional) and embarks on their own and is “done” is not sound. Feedback and support to always improve is critical. Artists of all disciplines have a coach or teacher throughout their career. Earnest professional development and participation in Professional Learning Communities would have a huge benefit in staying current on educational developments and trends. Many schools offer these things in some way, but much of it is lip service rather than serious intent. With continuous new technology being developed, schools need to have personnel to research and learn about these developments and present them to teachers on a regular basis, not at a once a year workshop. All of the budget cuts have brought less of this opportunity instead of more in a time when expectations are greater. Daily, one reads how STEM education must be a part of all learning along with student centered classrooms, and without professional development and support, teachers are ill equipped from their training to implement any of this. I understand what is needed, but I am frustrated by how difficult it is to make it happen.

  2. Very much on target. Going back to the greatest generation, and before, it seems every generation was willing to make some sacrifice so that the next generation, or at least one’s immediate offspring would have better access to education and a better role in society. Somehow we (baby boomers) lost that goal and it has never been fully regained. We don’t invest resources in training teachers because we do not value their role in society. We don’t trust the teachers to teach, and we don’t require them to be students first and teachers second, so that they will know whereof they teach. But then one comes across the occasional program or student, willing to look past the nonsense and posturing and find teaching a rewarding long term investment. These few, like Abraham’s ten righteous men, make it worth not giving up.

    • Diana Laboy-Rush on said:

      Don, Thank you for this comment! You really have a way with words. I agree that it is the few who are doing the unthinkable that will inspire the masses and transform the system. In all honesty, searching for these innovators – programs, teacher, and students – is what gets me out of bed every morning! Thanks for commenting. – Diana

  3. harrykeller on said:

    I have been advocating for the “Guild” approach for many years. It’s really nice to see that someone is not just advocating for it but actually doing it.

    Doing projects that take some considerable time to complete and that involve real engineering or, occasionally, science should be a part of every science education. Science teachers have to become “Renaissance” people who know not just the science in the textbooks, but the history and philosophy of science, understand engineering, are really good at applied math, and use technology fluently AND also can teach technical writing, incorporate art into their classrooms, and put the advance of science over millenia into context for students including discussing the lives of scientists.

    It’s a tall order but one that the Guild approach might foster if it chose to do so. It’s what a master science (or, these days, STEM) teacher should be capable of.

    PBL can be a part of every science class but only a part. I’d like to see much more science investigation taking place, which is why I created Smart Science Education. Come visit me.

  4. Excellent point above harrykeller….I just had parents night at my school, and the last thing I let them hear from me, is that I want their kids to be the ones to re-light the Age of Enlightenment…

    Now, regarding how teachers are trained is not so much a reflection of society, but the entrenched forces within the educational systems in our districts.

    They talk about hiring the best and brightest to do the jobs, but which best and brightest wants to be micromanaged to death, and then get blamed for the product. We are making everything in education too complicated for its own good, but people are making money that way…go figure!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: